Valentino vs Mario Valentino: Two Separate Companies, One Shared Name
Two separate Italian companies sell handbags under the word Valentino, the two are unrelated, and the resulting confusion is old enough to have produced its own case law. One of them is the Roman couture house founded in 1960; the second is a leather goods and footwear business founded in Naples in 1952. Each of them is legitimate, both hold documented rights to the name in their own way, and it was a private contract in 1979, rather than a judge, that drew the boundary between them. What follows sets out who each company is, what the agreement requires of each side, which ground the recent litigation covered and how it finished, and how a shopper can work out in seconds which company made a given bag. What follows is a trademark story rather than an accusation aimed at either side, and nothing below should be read as a finding of wrongdoing. Read it once and you will never misread a listing again.
Two houses, two cities, two businesses
Valentino S.p.A. is the Roman house founded in 1960 by Valentino Garavani and Giancarlo Giammetti, with its first atelier on Via Condotti. Ownership no longer has anything to do with the founder: the founder sold the business in 1998, control passed to Mayhoola for Investments in 2012 for around 700 million euros, and Kering took thirty per cent in July 2023, planning to buy the company outright by 2028. Valentino Garavani himself stepped back from design in 2007, valentino quilted shoulder bag presented his last couture collection in January 2008 and died on 19 January 2026 at the age of 93, meaning nothing in the present bag collection came from his hand. Mario Valentino S.p.A. is an entirely separate company, set up in Naples in 1952 by a man of that name and headquartered there still, and it is a leather goods and footwear house rather than a couture maison. Its bags are sold as Valentino by Mario Valentino, and its claims to have invented the stiletto heel and the women’s moccasin are self-description rather than verified history.
The 1979 agreement that split the name
A coexistence agreement signed in 1979 set out which marks each side could put on which goods, and it is still the document everything else refers back to. Under it, Mario Valentino may use Mario Valentino, M. Valentino, Valentino, MV or V on the exterior, provided the full name appears inside the item and on the packaging. That same agreement prevents the company from using V and Valentino together on leather goods. Running the other way, Valentino S.p.A. is contractually obliged to use GARAVANI in addition to VALENTINO on its leather goods and in the advertising for them. There is a distinct United States angle as well: Mario Valentino’s stated position is that it has held the American trademark Valentino for handbags and leather goods since 26 April 1971, a senior-rights point corroborated in legal reporting.
Why one company is obliged to write GARAVANI
On a Roman-house bag, the surname on the interior tag is there by contract, not by design preference. On account of the way the 1979 agreement divided the marks, and because of the senior US rights position on handbags, Valentino S.p.A. does not present its leather goods under the single word Valentino. Adding GARAVANI is what keeps the mark distinct, and that is why VALENTINO GARAVANI shows up in capitals on the tag and in bag advertising. Inside the Roman house the same wording doubles as a naming convention: accessories carry Valentino Garavani, and ready-to-wear falls under Valentino and Maison Valentino. That is a single company applying one set of standards, not a lower tier and a higher one. The practical consequence is the most useful fact in the whole subject: the couture house’s bags say GARAVANI, while a bag marked only Valentino on the outside with Mario Valentino inside is a genuine Mario Valentino, a separate company at a different price point.
The lawsuit filed in 2019, and its ending
In July 2019 Valentino S.p.A. brought suit against Mario Valentino in the US District Court for the Central District of California, docketed 2:19-cv-6306. In April 2021 Mario Valentino’s counterclaims were dismissed. On 14 June 2024 the case itself was settled and dismissed without prejudice, and the terms were never disclosed. The words without prejudice matter here, because either side remains free to bring the matter back. Reporting also suggests that more than ten proceedings, arbitrations among them, remained live in Italy, so the 2024 dismissal ended one American case rather than the whole disagreement. The claims pleaded in the action were:
- Alleged false advertising and unfair competition.
- A claimed breach of the 1979 coexistence agreement.
- An allegation that certain handbags were lookalikes of the couture house’s designs.
- Alleged unauthorised use of the V mark on leather goods.
The disagreement is reported to have escalated from 2017 onward, when handbag advertising started putting the word VALENTINO forward on its own. Because the case settled, none of it was tested to judgment, and neither company was the subject of any finding of wrongdoing.
The second case, filed in 2022
A separate action pointed the other way and drew in a third party. In October 2022 Mario Valentino S.p.A. filed suit against Fashionphile Group LLC in the Southern District of New York, docketed 1:22-cv-08984. The complaint alleged that roughly four hundred handbags had been listed on the resale platform as VALENTINO when they were in fact goods of Valentino S.p.A. The outcome of that case is unverified here and should not be described as resolved in either direction. The naming problem does not stop at the two companies: it extends to resale platforms, marketplace listings and anyone who describes a bag in a single word. The lesson for a buyer is that the title of a listing is the least reliable part of any resale page.
Which shelves each brand actually reaches
The two companies reach shoppers through different channels, which resolves much of the confusion. The Roman house sells directly through its own webstore and boutiques and through a defined set of authorised retailers including Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Mytheresa, Net-a-Porter, Farfetch, Selfridges, Harrods and Tessabit. Its legitimate off-price channel is THE OUTNET, the off-price arm of Net-a-Porter, though how deep the discounting goes there is not something to state with confidence. The Naples company’s bags are the ones that appear on the shelves of American off-price chains, as those retailers’ own brand filter pages confirm. That is why a Valentino bag sale at an off-price chain is seldom what a shopper looking for the couture house actually means. Neither case involves any impropriety: both are simply companies selling their own goods through their own distribution. Observed 2026 market prices for the couture house’s leather goods ran from about $650 for a VLogo Signature clutch in grainy calfskin to $7,900 for an embroidered Panthea, all made in Italy, and Rebag’s data puts the house’s average resale retention near 41 per cent.
| Comparison point | Valentino S.p.A. | Mario Valentino S.p.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Founded in | Rome, 1960 | Naples, 1952 |
| Bag branding | Valentino Garavani | Valentino by Mario Valentino |
| Marking inside | VALENTINO, GARAVANI, MADE IN ITALY | Mario Valentino inside and on the packaging |
| Usual channels | Its own boutiques, plus Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Mytheresa and Farfetch | Off-price chains, among them Nordstrom Rack, Saks OFF 5TH and TJ Maxx |
Thirty seconds to tell them apart
Start with the inside of the bag, not the outside. On a couture-house bag the interior tag carries VALENTINO and GARAVANI in capitals along with MADE IN ITALY, stitched down on all four sides, with consistent font weight and evenly pressed stamping. There is usually a serial number on a tag inside an interior pocket, though it is not universal, older pieces may have none, and an absent number by itself proves nothing. These bags have no date-code system, meaning any guide offering to decode a manufacturing date from the digits is describing something that does not exist. If the exterior reads only Valentino and the interior says Mario Valentino, you are holding a genuine Naples-made bag from the other company. That trap cuts both ways: an authentic Mario Valentino bag fails a Garavani checklist despite being entirely genuine, so establish which company made a bag before asking whether it is real.
What it all means when you buy
Neither company is the counterfeit here, and framing this as fake against real misses what is happening. Want the Roman house? Search Valentino Garavani rather than Valentino on its own, and check the tag before you look at the price. If the Naples company’s leather goods suit you, buy them with your eyes open and enjoy the lower price, a price that reflects a different business, not a compromised version of the same one. Where it goes wrong is in resale listings and third-party marketplaces that describe both with one word, which is precisely the territory the 2022 case covered. Any pre-owned Valentino bag described only as Valentino calls for clear photographs of the interior tag before money changes hands. Ask for them, and a decades-old tangle reduces to a two-second check.
